Liberty Reborn

The official home of conservative/libertarian author J.J. Jackson

Archive for the ‘Free Speech’ Category

» The More McCain Talks The Dumber I Know He Is

Right now I am preparing myself for the inevitable onslaught of angry emails from indignant McCain supporters who just hate how I point out how utterly stupid and unqualified to be a Senator this man is. These emails ignore the truth of the mater and the facts that I discuss and almost always resort to the final claim that because he served in the military and served as a POW that he deserves more respect than I give him. I know the claim is vacuous and put forth by sophomoric types that cannot legitimately defend a man who has been one of the biggest destroyers of our Republic. But I am ready for them none-the-less.

full story

» Once Again Liberals On THe Wrong Side of Public Opinion

Recently I mused about whether or not liberals, and the Democratic Party they call home, have any popular ideas whatsoever on my blog. Seems as though every time a poll is taken on the specifics of what they want to do, not necessarily the overall idea, they are met with a wall of public opposition.

full story

» RINOs Still Looking Pretty In 2010

Oh you die hard Republicans who are Republicans first and everything else second wonder why I criticize the Republican Party and their candidates and their voter’s willingness to do the right thing and utimately worry about the Party? You really really wonder these things? Honestly?

full story

» Surprise! ACORN Sues O’Keefe Over Video!

Well, not really a surprise. This what liberals always do. They get caught doing naughty things and then they sue those that expose them. ACORN has now filed suit against Brietbart’s BigGovernment.com, O’Keefe and his partner Giles because Maryland law requires two party consent for audio recordings of conversations. The short explanation for such a law is that Maryland wants to protect people too stupid to watch what they do when interacting with other people. Personally the law is probably borderline unconstitutional because it prohibits someone from obtaining evidence as to what someone else said in a conversation (without their consent) so that party A can defend themselves against party B in case of a slander or libel lawsuit.

full story

Send comments to:

Send your hatemail to: