“There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. You built a factory out there? Good for you!” Wow, thanks I guess. Then she bumbled on, “But I want to be clear, you moved your goods to market on roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did.”

Uh, Elizabeth, sweetheart, darling, I hate to break it to you but many factories and places of business in America DO need indeed hire their own security forces to protect their property. Why? Because the police cannot be there to protect it at all times for them from the spawn of liberalism who think they are entitled to just take whatever the factory has. Time to change that burned out bulb in your head toots.

And the larger point here is that she is totally out of touch with reality claiming that people other that the wealthy built the roads of this nation and educated our children. If she would look at the actual numbers in terms of taxes paid and which cover such services she would see that indeed the rich themselves carry that burden almost exclusively.

But Ms. Warren is not one to let the facts get in the way of a good class warfare rant. She might as well wear a hat advertising the space available between here ears which says, “Room for rent – logic and truth need not apply.”

Simple.  It’s politics.  Democrats fear that if they extend the tax cut now for a year then voters might forget.  Also, with Republicans pushing the long term, and better solution, Democrats cannot let them have that political victory under their belts for the 2012 elections.  The closer liberals can push the renewal of the extension towards election day, they figure, the better off they will be come election time and the more favor they can get from voters for extending the tax.  Their plan appears to be to keep passing regular, but short term, extensions to the cuts to keep “reminding” the American people that they are sort of for lowering their taxes … but only short term.

They have shown over the past year since losing power in the House that they are full of bluster.  Do they really think that with a full year extension coming out of the House (Republican controlled) that they will gain politically if they hold up that year extension for their paltry two month one ?  Of course they do.  They are liberals and they think down is up and up is down.

The American people want a long term extension because it is money in their pocket and they honestly do not care about the already bankrupt liberal, social programs the tax funds.  Only in Liberal La La Land does holding up a year long extension in favor one for a couple months even remotely sound like a reasonable idea.

I said back when the payroll tax cut was passed that it would become one of those political impossibilities to ever allow to laspe.  So far it is proving exactly such.

The Senate’s month extension is a failure before it even starts.  It would be very difficult to balance at year’s end to make sure everyone has paid what they are supposed to if in March the rate went back up.  And the reality is that the House has already proposed a full year extension of the pay roll tax cut giving not just certainty but consistency for 2012 without anyone worrying about what the next months will bring.  But with the Senate Democrats skedaddling out of town like cowards, there can be no reconciliating before the end of the year.  Once again, the yellow streak of the liberals is shown.

They can run around on January 1st and point fingers all they want at the Republicans but when the American people learn, and they will learn, that the Democrats were the ones that stood in the way of a full year extension and that all they were willing to give was a meager two months of cuts I don’t think there are any number of words that can spin their way out of the trouble they will be in.

In fact, unable to deal with the fact that once the people of Florida got to know him they rejected him in a devastating loss, Mr. Grayson is back looking to return to the halls of Congress and make a further brown stain on the underwear of our federal legislative body. Right now his campaign is running internet ads begging for amounts as low as just five dollars so that Mr. Grayson can have his bipolar personality displayed to the viewers of C-SPAN. Yes, the man whose idiocy, insanity and penchant for outrageously factless statements which only pale in comparison to speeches by Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin is giving it another go. Apparently he does not think anyone is as capable of perpetuating the Big Lie as well as he is.

Grayson is a prototypical liberal. The difference between him and say, Nancy Pelosi or Barack Obama however is that he is not shy about telling people what liberals really believe to be true and exposing the lunacy of that ideology to the world. Although it seems Queen Nancy and Lord Barack are becoming less inhibited these days. Like all liberals, Mr. Grayson engaged regularly in projection, the art of accusing others of doing or being what you are, whenever he was allowed time to speak.

He said of the Republicans in Congress that they wanted sick people to, “Die quickly,” while the push for Obamacare was in full bloom and he was salivating over the ability to control our health care. More completely he said, hilariously, “The Republican health care plan for America: Don’t get sick. That’s right, don’t get sick. If you have insurance, don’t get sick. If you don’t have insurance, don’t get sick. If you’re sick, don’t get sick. If you get sick in America, the Republican health care plan is this: Die quickly. That’s right. The Republicans want you to die quickly if you get sick.” The only thing missing from this rant was a hefty does of blame for the evil, Zionist Jews, the New World Order and perhaps the Free Masons.

Ok, aside from being disjointed, rambling and more than a little incoherent, the truth of course is just the opposite of what Mr. Grayson claimed. It is liberals who have always wanted the sick to die quickly. Just look at every country with a national health care system run by left wing bureaucrats and politicians. Every month there are stories about treatment for people who are sick, often terminally so, being rejected because the costs would be too much for the system to bear. And remember, it was President Obama himself who suggested that old people who needed surgery should perhaps suck it up and just take a pain pill instead. Obama’s national health care requirement has, on top of this, various requirements for government bureaucrats to decide how, when and if treatment is to be administered, ie. “Death Panels”. Once widely mocked as nonexistant lies concocted by evil right-wingers, even liberals like Barney Frank are running away from those “myths” and trying to repeal them. It was Democrats, liberal Democrats, Mr. Grayson’s own party, that supported killing the sick if we want to be historically accurate.

In a further case of projection, Alan Grayson, unable to come up with a coherent argument, made another dumb statement. He said, “Scientists have studied for years this difficult question of why some people have a conscious and some people don’t. Some people are called Democrats and some people are called Republicans.” Wow, such dim wit. I sure hope he caries a flashlight at night, because Mr. Grayson’s intellect is not so great that it will push back the darkness on its own. Of course, Mr. Grayson’s attempted point here is that Republicans are mean, cruel and callous bastards who do not give a damn about other people because they won’t support liberal ideas. Liberal ideas, I might add, that history has proven time and again lead to suffering and societal collapse.

In fact, if anyone does not have a conscious, by definition it is a liberal. Having a conscious means that you not only know the difference between right and wrong, but when faced with a choice between the two you pick the former and not the later. Liberals, and again history shows this, will 11 times out of 10 pick the wrong course of action and that action causes misery without any hope for a better tomorrow as long as liberals remain in control. Venezuela, Cuba, China, Somalia, Libya, Iran, Greece, Italy, California, Detroit, Chicago, and every other liberal stronghold proves this point beyond a shadow of a doubt. Except to liberals like Alan Grayson of course. To liberals like Alan Grayson, these failed liberal bastions are not run by various flavors of statist, totalitarian liberals implimenting their idiocy upon the people. And even if they were? Wel, Republicans and conservatives are the reason why they are failures; not liberalism.

He further went on to criticize his political opposition in this manner. “We’re dealing with people on the other side who are utterly unscrupulous. These are foot-dragging, knuckle-dragging, Neanderthals who know nothing but ‘no’.” Of course, again, he is talking about Republicans, conservative Republicans anyway, because they would not agree to let Alan Grayson and his fellow leftists do whatever they wanted without any regard for the Constitutionality of it all. How “Neanderthal” of them right?

But the funny thing was that liberals like Alan Grayson were very adept at saying “no” themselves. They said “no” to allowing Republicans in on negotiations for the hideous Obamacare legislation because they wanted no objections and scruitiny. They said “no” to allowing failed businesses to fail and instead spent billions of dollars propping them up. They even said “no” repeatedly to passing an actual budget in Congress. In fact, liberals in the Senate are still to this day saying “no” to such an action. President Obama himself said “no” to the political opposition once telling them that they had to move to the back of the bus.

As a Congressman, Mr. Grayson said once of Dick Cheney that the Vice-President had, “blood that drips from his teeth while he is talking.” Yet liberals like Grayson gleefully run after the evil “rich” like vampires in search of a meal to sustain their insatiable appetite for more and more spending. Want to talk about “blood dripping from teeth”? Look at a liberal.

He even once called a woman a “whore” because she was a lobbyist for K-Street. But Grayson whoring himself out to liberalism for a few minutes of infamy every now and again? Oh, that is ok.

Oh sure, you folks down in Florida could probably do worse than have Mr. Grayson as your representative. But I have not heard that Mao Zedong has opted to throw his hat into the ring for the up coming election. So right now he is your worst choice possible who has officially declared. Vote for him and you get the government you deserve, one where everything he accuses the opposition of is pushed hard and fast by him and his fellow liberals. He will kill you quickly and do so proudly.

Frank has signed on to legislation written by Tennessee Republican Representative Phil Roe to repeal the IPAB, part of the “Death Panels” that Obama and other liberals claimed did not exist.  Amazing how the truth always comes out eh?  And amazing how liberals are always shown to be bold faced liars.

“Basically, there’s a certain amount of money that’s allocated for Medicare spending each year,” Roe said in March. “Once you hit that amount that’s been appropriated, this board, this bureaucratically appointed board, can then decide, not based on quality or need, but based on strictly cost.”

Why would anyone ever trust a liberal?  I mean, aside from a severe mental disorder.

When the rats start abandoning ship, you know you are in trouble.

I mean, things have to be really bad for Frank to give up his cushy position which requires him to not think and just recite talking pouts fed to him by his handlers. Consider that despite video of Comrade Frank chastising those watching over Freddie and Fannie when they were warning of the pending crash of the housing market circulating widely in the previous election he still won in 2010 with 55% of the vote.

Well, odds are a new, far left, moonbat crank will take his place. But honestly he or she will probably not be worse than Barney. So it is either a wash or we come out slightly better for this decision.

Get out Barney … yes, do it! Get while the getting is good.

Now that doesn’t seem that bad to anyone that would actually care about America’s financial future. But to politicos who can never stomach the thought that their precious programs would have to do with less, it is unfathomable to consider doing with less. And a 4% cut in a year is damn near sacrilege! And, might I remind you, these cuts are just in proposed rates of growth and not actual, real cuts in spending.

Reports are that RINO Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham are trying to put together legislation to neuter the mandatory cuts. In a sense, they actually have a legitimate beef in that they do not want Defense spending cut and defense is actually an enumerated Constitutional power of our federal government. Whereas Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc are not and also slated for essentially piddly cuts. They actually have a leg to stand on while the liberals do not.

Democrats are equally adamant that they will not let the automatic cuts to their sacred unconstitutional cows happen.

We could balance our budget tomorrow and have enough money left over to start seriously paying down our $15 trillion national debt IF all the liberal sacred cows were slaughtered. And there are savings to be had in the military budget as well.

But liberals will never allow us to cut out the crap. Neither the Democrats or the RINOs. And when the sun rises tomorrow, nothing will get solved. If we cannot agree to cut 4% in the rate of growth from a standard rate of 6% or 7% and only grow at 2% or 3% how can it?

Assume the crash position. Because this plane is going down. Meanwhile a bunch of little Neros are all fiddling.

Look, we don’t need to raise taxes to increase government revenues. We just need Democrats to actually PAY their taxes! Problem solved. Let’s move on with finding cuts to unconstitutional spending now.

“One of the things about Herman Cain is, I think that he makes that white Republican base of the party feel okay, feel like they are not racist because they can like this guy,” Finney said. “I think he giving that base a free pass. And I think they like him because they think he’s a black man who knows his place. I know that’s harsh, but that’s how it sure seems to me.”

Hmmm. Then there is this:

“I think when [members of the Tea Party] can vote for a Herman Cain and hear him say the things that he says they feel like, ‘Well, you know, I can, I support this guy and…so it shows that I’m not racist and I’m supportive,’” Cummings told host David Gregory.

Gee, that’s weird. Especially coming from liberal Democrats. You know, the same liberal Democrats who, years ago, did not believe that all men were created equal but that black men and women and children were put on this Earth to serve them? The same liberal Democrats who rather than grant equal constitutional rights to blacks threw a hissy fit and tried to run away from the Union so that they could continue to oppress them? The same liberal Democrats who after they lost the Civil War resorted to forming roving bands that ran around and lynched blacks? The same liberal Democrats who, once they got the reigns of power back in the South, undid all the gains of blacks in that region and returned them to oppression. The same liberal Democrats who formed the KKK. The same liberal Democrats who fought tooth and nail against civil rights for blacks in the early 1900′s. The same liberal Democrats who called blacks human weeds and set up abortion clinics specifically for the purpose of controlling their population.

Sounds to me like it was liberal Democrats who in 2008 supported a black man, named Barack Obama, to try and purge themselves of their own feeling of guilt if you ask me.

Me on the other hand? I voted for Alan Keyes. Not because he was black. But because he was the best man running for the Presidency. There is no way, not with all the spin in the world, that you can make the argument that an arrogant, racist, community organizer from the streets of Chicago who was raised by Marxists and palled around willingly with communists then thugged his way into the Senate had anywhere near the qualifications of Mr. Keyes.

Thus, I rest my case. Liberals are indeed projecting once again. Conservatives on the other hand? We vote on merit.