Combined that with their incoherent rants about everything from evil corporations not “giving” them jobs, to banks not “giving” them money, to rants against Wall Street but in favor of President Obama who receives oodles of Wall Street donations, to demands to grow the size of government, demand amnesty for illegals with open borders for all, to whatever the person before the camera thinks is the most important issue to them, and there really is no comparison between the leftist thugs of Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party.  As much as liberal media loons have been trying to make this comparison lately, since the Occupy Wall Street movement cannot gain a real foothold and needs union hacks bussed in daily to support them, it is an argument only people without brains will buy.

It is funny though.  Nancy Pelosi just recently praised the Occupy Wall Street Crowd.  Previously she denounced the Tea Party.

She denounced people that believe in smaller government, the Constitution, who are tolerant, who do not commit crimes when they assemble and who clean up after themselves.  She praised people who want bigger government, hate the Constitution, hate the Jews, commit crimes and leave a big mess behind.

Hey, not like I haven’t been telling you for years that this is who she, and all the big wigs in the Democratic Party are.  It is just further proof that I have been right all along.

Yesterday, as I pointed out, I mentioned that the shooter of Congressman Giffords and several others in Tuscon, Arizona struck me as an anti-Semite, Jew hater based on his disjointed ramblings posted on YouTube. I got some heat for that from leftists who emailed telling me that I was just a “desperate conservative hater” (as one emailer put it) trying to spin the whole event and “aleve(sic) the Tea Party of culpability in this heinous act”.

But now what do we find out? According Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Mr. Loughner was at least interested in a group called American Renaissance. What does this group believe? Well, if you do a Google search on them you find that their site’s description states that they promote, “a variety of white racial positions.” They call themselves “conservative” but considering that conservatives believe that all me are created equal, promoting one race over others is hardly so.

It should be noted that throughout history if you find someone preoccupied with race and involved in white power sort of movements that they are almost almost liberals (socialists, Marxists, etc). Witness, southern (liberal) Democrats prior to and post the Civil War, Hitler, Stalin, etc.

Juicy quotes from their “Reader’s Guide” include:

“If whites permit themselves to become a minority population, they will lose their civilization, their heritage, and even their existence as a distinct people.”

“School integration, “civil rights,” racial preferences, the franchise — all have evolved in ways that undermine the ability of whites to lead their lives as they wish.”

“Racial loyalty or racial consciousness is normal and healthy.”

Yeah, I think you can say that these guys are white supremacists. Oh, and Ms. Giffords, by the way, is Jewish. Nudge, nudge, wink, wink … a race that white supremacists tend to really hate.

Reports The Hill:

Fox News reported Sunday morning that an internal Department of Homeland Security memo obtained by the network indicated that suspect Jared Lee Loughner, 22, is “possibly linked” to an anti-Semitic, white supremacist group.

The DHS memo called the group American Renaissance “anti-government, anti-immigration, anti-ZOG (Zionist Occupational Government), anti-Semitic.” The information reportedly came as Loughner’s computer and personal effects were searched in the shooting investigation.

The group’s leader told Fox that they had no record of Loughner being on the subscriber list or attending events.

But is this group really anti-Semetic? I don’t know. Under an article reposted on their site from the London Telegraph titled, “Jews Leave Swedish City After Sharp Rise in Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes”, there is not a lot of anti-Semitism that I see. Just a lot of ignorant keep the races separate talk for the most part. In fact one poster references the Holocaust and the horror of the Jews under Hitler. This is something I have found real anti-Semites simply don’t do. If anything they deny the Holocaust to the hilt.

Others just post weird and illogical things such as, “Sweden should be filled with Swedes, & only Swedes. I’ll bet that thought is filling many Swedish heads these days, much as they would deny it.” As though a Swede cannot be a Jew? Judaism is, after all a religion, not a race.

Another comment:

“Jews are disproportionately influential, verbally adept, and generally have more political power and more say in the media – and they have generally been major backers of multiculturalism.

Perhaps this experience will change their minds. Let us hope so, anyway. Be nice to have more Jews on our side of the political divide.”

This doesn’t sound very “anti-Semtic” either if you ask me. Again, disjointed, a little misguided, ok perhaps, but not by any stretch of the imagination seething Jew hatred.

Another commenter even said, “Well, at least these Jews have an ethnostate of their own where the door is always open for them.” Support for Israel among anti-Semites? That would be a new one for me to come across.

Homeland Security calls these guys and gals anti-Semites. Ok, maybe they are, but they are some of the most tame anti-Semites I have every come across if they are. To me it just sounds like they are ignorant racists who think that any mixing of races and creeds is bad and that racial purity is the key to societal happiness. Maybe you can call that anti-Semitism in the sense that they don’t want Jews around.

Record or not though of Mr. Loughner’s membership, it is amazing that this man would be poking around such groups huh if he weren’t interested in them. That thing, that no one seems to want to call a duck is waddling more like one and quacking more like one every minute it seems.

I said yesterday on this lunatic, responding to liberals who were quick to paint him as a Tea Partier:

You want to know what type of person Mr. Laughner sounds like to me? Really? Ok, I’ll tell you. He sounds like these batty retards I meet every now and again who are certain, certain beyond all reason, that the evil Jews run the world from secret societies, that Zionists are out to take over the world and are rewriting history while eliminating their political advisories.

I further went on to say that I was not certain he was an anti-Semite, only that his actions and words strike a familiar tone:

I am not saying that Mr. Laughner is a Jew hater, only that he exhibits a lot of the same traits as these people do. Maybe he will turn out to be such. But here is what I know; he is unhinged and mentally deficient.

I am, apparently, not alone. Several emailers and other bloggers have made this same connection to his bizarre ranting about currency, mind control, conspiracy, etc. All of these things are common among anti-Semites who try to paint the world as under some sort of “Zionist” conspiracy.

One blogger, Michael Haltman, who posts at American Conservative Daily, also said that he sees this possibility:

Sick, mentally ill and deranged minds will do sick and horrendous things.

Loughner is obviously insane, possibly anti-Semitic and anti-government. As a result, this man possessed the ability to target innocent men, women and children in a heinous attack.

Sometimes, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, even if it is not wearing a sign saying “I’m a duck” it just might be a duck.

Even as the most recent round of leaks by Mr. Assange was started the left salivated. They heard that the leaks would contain all sorts of classified documents about Iraq, Afghanistan, the wars waged there. And from that point on I was receiving all sorts of gleeful emails from assorted folks telling me how these documents would prove the United States was behind the 9/11 attacks, that Saddam Hussein never had any WMDs at all, that Osama bin Laden was really a covert CIA operative whose mission it was to perpetrate “false flag” terrorist attacks, and on and on.

Then the leaks came. Not one document verifying a conspiracy in the White House by that incompetent George W. Bush fellow to kill Americans on a fateful day in September. Not one document tying Osama bin Laden to the CIA. But we did get a plethora of documents that documented how repeatedly and often U.S. forces in Iraq found weapons caches that tested positive for blister agents and verified how prevalent Saddam’s weapons really were even as our own government refused to point this out when challenged.

And with each leak, after all the bluster from the left and conspiracy theorists, they slinked back into the woodwork disappointed.

In fact, the vast majority of these documents leaked by Mr. Assange were not really all that ground breaking. I am sorry but I have to tell truth and that is the truth. They were classified, but the information within many of them was known for years by anyone with sources inside Washington. Civilians caught in the crossfire between terrorists who hid among them, using them as human shields, and the U.S. military? Nope, nothing groundbreaking with that. China acting as an intermediary between North Korea and Iran? Yawn! That was only news to those leftists with their head in the sand. The only difference now was we had the document to prove it not just the hearsay that we had previously. Liberals within our government conspiring to bribe and even threaten other countries to get them to sign on Global Warming/Climate Change actions that were being discredited left and right? Still not really news. But it made the left hush up even tighter now that the evidence was out.

We even had diplomatic cables which shockingly, he says facetiously, showed that our diplomats had some unkind things to say about foreign leaders. Spare me the outrage. Chancellor Merkel in Germany and Mr. Pootie-Poo over there in Russia can feign all the outrage they want over such things but the fact is they say the same, and worse, about our leaders. And they already knew about 98% of these cables and what they said. It makes good television for them to pretend to be in high dudgeon over them but in the world of diplomacy it means nothing because of what we know they have said about us.

But among the entirety of these tabloid like letters and documents that proved things we already knew were enough documents that should never have been released and never would have been released by anyone with a moral compass that wasn’t broken. Now, some of my more naive libertarian friends disagree with this. They think that our government should not have any secrets at all from the American people. Seriously though? Does anyone that has expended any brain power at all really think that the location of a Special Forces detachment in a war zone should not be something closely guarded? Or do some people really think, and I use that term loosely, that we should announce their exact location so the enemy can take them out? Do not laugh because those sorts of people actually do exist and Julian Assange is one of them.

We learned in the course of these leaks things like the names of those in Afghanistan who had sided with and aided our troops against the terrorists in the Taliban. Yeah, with that information floating around how easy to you think it will be in the future to get people to turn on the terrorists? This is the problem with Mr. Assange and Wikileaks in that they have no filter and their moral compass points South by South West instead of North. Terrorists, the United States military, eh, they are all the same in the eyes of Mr. Assange. In fact, to be honest, the United States military is probably much worse to people like him.

At this point in time there is really no argument that Mr. Assange has engaged in espionage. But instead he is sitting in jail on some trumped up rape charge which is so laughable that no one, even those people like me who think Assange is scum, believe it for one minute.

And people wonder why our government is rarely taken seriously? Maybe instead of keeping so many pointless secrets the government should focus on just those that are really and truly important secrets? Do that and Julian Assange and Wikileaks becomes even more irrelevant than they already are for distributing common, but classified, knowledge. But common knowledge none-the-less.

It is nothing new. The left hates the mere thought of us common folk having guns to defend our lives and they hate even worse the thought that us common folk would have guns and one day get fed up with their fascist left wing ways and turn those weapons on them. But here are the facts. Despite the city’s current “gun ban” Chicago is a hell hole of violent crimes committed by guns. Yeah, proving once again that criminals don’t obey the laws. A shocking revelation for liberals to be sure and one that they will quickly dismiss with their typical intellectual vacancy.

You know how it goes. They claim that it would be much worse if they didn’t have the gun ban and other such nonsense. Actually I would contend, and the data shows, that when criminals fear that the citizenry is armed criminals get a lot let bold and gun violence goes down. Criminals are indeed dumb but they are not stupid. They don’t very much like the prospect of picking on someone packing heat and that is much more likely when a city like Chicago doesn’t criminalize law abiding citizens and make illegal basic Constitutional Rights.

Daley and the left are not going down without a fight and they are not going to go away without once again doing what they do best and lie. In defense of the stupid law the response from the Mayor is:

“We have the right for health and safety to pass reasonable laws dealing with the protection and health of the people of the city of Chicago,” Daley said.

Nice leap right over any sense of logic there Mr. Daley! Yes, you do have the right to pass “reasonable laws” but a gun ban like the one you currently have is not “reasonable.” see, that’s the problem! It is not reasonable because it is unconstitutional and like it or not the Constitution trumps your claims that the gun ban is reasonable! The law of the land is that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed Mr. Daley. It is not, shall not be infringed if the all-knowing, all-seeing Mayor Daley decides that in Chicago it should be. Sorry, that caveat does not exist and try as you might you will never find it.

Maybe you flunked English Mr. Daley or maybe you are just really dumb as a post. I don’t know. What I do know is that you are too stupid to be a leader of free men and women.

Does the name Billy Dale happen to ring any bells Senatorette Clinton? Remember the man that you and your husband trumped up embezzlement charges on just so you could get him out of the White House Travel Office, a position he held for three decades? And why? To give the position to Harry Thomason; Clinton crony.

Sure, maybe you can claim that you had nothing to do with that. And sure, maybe those fawning over you at your campaign stops might believe that. But the truth is different. When notes by David Watkins were subpoenaed in the case, they read that there were, “periodic reports from Vince Foster that [the] First Lady had inquired about [the] Travel Office and why wasn’t action being taken” and that, “they should be fired immediately and out of here by the end of the day.”

Of course that wasn’t the only case during the eight years of the Clinton presidency, but it illustrates the point pretty clearly. Especially considering that Billy Dale was found not guilty in a matter of hours and even eventually reimbursed by Congress for his costs that were accumulated in his defense against of Clinton cronyism.

The Bill Clinton pardon list also contains several instances of people that were pardoned for “obstruction of justice” and “perjury”. So much for things that need “to be held sacred” huh?

I hate to revisit the whole Scooter Libby affair but how can one let this sort of insanity go unanswered especially as Hillary holds hands and shares the stage with former President Clinton? History has got to account for something.

To boot I am still waiting for the “justice” that Scooter Libby “obstructed” and “perjured” himself in the pursuit of hiding to be prosecuted. I’m still waiting for the known leaker, one Richard Armitage, to be hauled up on charges. I am still wondering how, if Armitage was known to be the leaker Libby could have “obstructed” anything.

If there was a crime here why did Fitzgerald not pursue Armitage? For that matter, why aren’t Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and all the other demagogues on the left not out there demanding that Armitage be tried?

The answer? Because there was no crime. No crime means no “obstruction of justice.” No crime also means that the whole charade was nothing more than a perjury trap to get a conviction as close to President Bush as possible.

I hear liberals whine about the “rule of law”. But what does the law say? The law says that the President has the right to reprieve and pardon those convicted of crimes. Its right there in Article II of the Constitution which, I realize, is something most people have never really read. I realize that liberals only want the laws they like enforced and that those change on a day to day, if not an hour by hour basis, but come on.

The power of the pardon is certainly overused and abused by Presidents. Lists of pardons longer than my arm are granted by many presidents and mostly for political reasons and gain. But to say that the rule of law was not obeyed when they are granted is ignorant. The Constitution itself sets itself as the “Supreme Law of the land”.

But every now and again, presidential pardon powers are justified. Like when a man is accused and convicted of a crime in the non-cover-up of a non-crime while the man that actually non-committed the non-crime is never even charged because there was no crime.

That’s when it is justified.

And let’s not forget that thus far all President Bush has done is give Scooter Libby a reprieve from his jail sentence after the judge ordered him to jail while he pushed forward his right to appeal. The conviction, as of right now, still stands pending appeal.

In the end, Libby will serve just as many days in prison as President William Jefferson Clinton did for willful perjury, suborning the perjury of others, “obstructing justice”, attempting to deny an American citizen her constitutionally guaranteed day in court as well as crimes associated with those acts; none.

It is easy to lay the blame for the carnage at the feet of yet another lunatic. It was his actions, his choice, his evil that terrorized the campus after all. And for this act, yes he bears all responsibility.

But others are not blameless. Because there are others that created the situation in which this horrific event occurred. There are still others that perpetuated the situation once it began because they were more concerned about perceptions, feelings and even laying down their own rights than they were about protecting themselves, their fellow citizens, and the students in their charge.

There is plenty of blame to go around. Blame goes to the school administrators and elected officials who ignorantly thought that with the magical wave of a pen they could make criminals and evil people obey “codes of conduct” and create safe workplaces by mandate. Blame goes to every person that came face to face with this coward who themselves was not armed and laid down their rights hoping for someone else to save them.

Hundreds of people had the chance to end these tragic events and save lives. Hundreds of people stared into the face of evil and cowered or even fled rather than confront it. And because of their choices, actions and inactions thirty-some students and faculty lay dead.

That is not to say that the day was not without its heroes. Liviu Librescu, who survived the Holocaust, knew evil when he saw it. He sacrificed his own life to barricade the door to his class room as a coward shot him. He allowed his students a chance to flee. But sadly there were not many more heroes. Saddly there were far too few Librescu’s.

All it would have taken was for one person to stand up and react to the warning signs given off by a troubled student that had a history of unfit conduct. All it would have taken was for one, just one, person to reject the belief that policy and pieces of paper can stop evil. All it would have taken was just one person to defy the insanity and refuse to lay down their own responsibility and their own rights. All it would have taken was one man or woman brave enough to embrace their own power and their own obligation to be armed as article I, Section 13 of the Virginia State Constitution so allows:

Certainly it has never been fashionable to blame victims of tragedy. But then again, I have never been one to be fashionable. Fashion has throughout history lead to the destruction of common sense and the rise of injustice after injustice and the needless suffering of innocents. I have always preferred reason and truth to whatever those that seek to deflect blame may claim as being “fashionable” in order to shield themselves from deserved scrutiny. It takes a lot more courage to prefer this to the comfort and convenience of “fashion”.

It is a shame that so many are dead. But what is of equal shame is that many are dead because they and their fellow citizens never learned the important lessons. Instead they were taught and forced to learn the unimportant and the meaningless in pursuit of God only knows what goal.

They never learned that our rights as citizens are insoluble even by the arbitrary whims of public officials and bureaucrats. They never learned that our rights as citizens are to be embraced and carried in our hearts proudly and without fear of reprisal by those in power who would seek to erode them. They never learned that when one attempts to revoke their rights, it is their responsibility to stand up and defy those men who would be tyrants and defy them by force if necessary. They never learned that when they choose to wilt before unconstitutional infringements of their rights eventually good people get hurt or sadly even killed. They never learned that waiting for others to protect them is a fatal decision in many cases. They never learned that the lawless and the evil will not be assuaged by pieces of paper and talk of “feelings” of safety.

Instead they proudly tout to the criminal that they have no means of defending themselves and invite evil upon them. Instead they lie down like lambs to be slaughtered by wolves. Instead they allow their rights to be usurped. Instead they scratch their heads wondering how this madman got a gun on campus.

Didn’t he read the policy?!? Didn’t he understand that the campus had been decreed as “safe”?!? Why would he ignore that?!?

Because he was evil; that’s why.

How much of the carnage must be put in hands of those that set such policies in motion? How much of the carnage must be laid at the feet of those that obeyed insane regulations and were unable to confront evil? And how much of the carnage that will happen in the future in similar and sadly tragic passion plays put on by the wicked will be placed in the laps of those that will continue to think that paper and words will stop the next massacre?

How many more criminals must break your precious decrees of “safety” before you realize that documents do not make you safe and that only strong and decisive action, vigilance and courage will succeed in securing your liberty and rights?

Many innocents and one lunatic are dead. Those who have as their motive controlling we the citizenry will say that it is because there were “too many” guns on campus the morning of April 16^th, 2007. But the truth is that the reason so many are dead is because there were far, far too few.

Innocent lives could have been spared. But they could not have been spared by papers, policies and decrees. They could have been spared if only law-abiding and noble citizens would have embraced their liberties and defied unjust laws and rules.

How many lives would have been saved if but one courageous citizen would have had the valor to defy their abridgement of liberty? If it was but only one, it would have been worth it.

It would have been worth it to watch the politicos wringing their hands today over the horror that someone would have dared to defy their policy. It would have been worth it to watch these same people debate whether or not that brave soul should be thrown off campus for saving lives despite being against the glorious rules. It would have been worth it to try and watch them justify their own insanity in the face of the facts. Because in the end what stopped this horrible situation? It was a gun.

Yes, it was the lunatic’s own gun, but it was a gun none-the-less. But it could have been the gun of a law-abiding citizen. That is, if there were any brave souls willing to defy their incompetent masters. In the lasting words of General John Stark, “Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.”

That is the lesson that needs to be learned.

The two incidents are not, in and of themselves, related except for the fact that I think I have come up with an amicable solution that will help us with the persistent problem of child molesters and at the same time make those that want to practice Jihad and kill “infidels” happy by aiding them on their journey to paradise – er, I mean Hell. It is truly a bolt of inspiration that struck me while accidentally looking at both these recent events.

People that prey on children for sex are right on par with people that want to strap bombs to themselves (or their children) and kill men, women and children going about their daily lives. Being so equally low on the evolutionary food chain I think that it is only right that we create a program to get these two groups together. You know, kind of like a “Big Brother” program or, better yet, a dating service for scumbags.

So here is the plan. Jihad loving terrorists would be allowed come into our prisons and pick out their own child molester to “mentor”. Maybe we will come up with a 40-point “compatibility” survey or something like that to make sure the matches are perfect. I have not quite decided on that. But once we have several groups of terrorists and child rapists paired up we will provide them with a small air plane and train one of the terrorists to fly it out of the goodness of our hearts.

All of them will be loaded on to the plane and then it will be welded shut to ensure none of our new couples can get off. We will give them enough fuel to get about 100 miles out over the ocean. Of course it will be guided by remote control for, let’s say, the first 75 miles of its flight just in case the terrorist pilot gets any bright ideas. We do not want to give these nutjobs a chance to veer off course and seek out the nearest city.

Each of the terrorists on the plane will also be given their own suicide vests which, will again, be disarmed until they reach at least the 75 mile mark. At which time all suicide vests will be activated.

Then Mohammed, Habib, Achmed, or whoever the pilot is will come on the intercom, lead the terrorists in a fervent chant of “Allah akbar!” and command all the terrorists to detonate their vests over the calm blue waters of either the Atlantic or the Pacific.

Maybe we will also fill the cargo hold of the plane with unclean pigs that will splatter the terrorists with blood when they go boom. Think of it like a “lottery”. If you are lucky enough to not get caught in the splatter you make it to paradise – uh, sorry again – I mean Hell.

I think it is the perfect solution to two of the biggest problems we face today. I would suggest that this program be done in secret by our government but I know that the New York Times would eventually find out about it and blow the cover off it anyway. So I will make this proposal with the terrorists in public. The deal is that you can kill yourself and take an “infidel” who happens to be a child molester with you.

Maybe we can call it “Take an Infidel child molester to work day.” What do you say? Do we have a deal?