So here we have liberals complaining about political pressure swaying Susan G. Komen and having a conniption fit over it and then turning around and leveling their own political pressure to get Susan G. Komen to do what they want them to do. Like I say a lot, if you want to know what liberals are doing, watch what they claim their opposition is doing. Liberals cannot, under no circumstances, allow any threat to the abortion mills, which make no mistake they fully support because they take care of the “human weeds”, run by Planned Parenthood.  And they will kick, scratch and lie in order to be allowed to keep killing all the “undesirables” they can get away with.

Oh, did I mention that most of these abortions happen in black neighborhoods? Just in case you didn’t know who the “human weeds” and “undesirables” are that they want gone are.

Two abortion doctors are being charged with murder after performing late term abortions on viable fetuses in Maryland because.  A grand jury handed down an indictment.

But these abortion mills aren’t in the business of killing babies right? That’s what liberals tell us.  But time and again we see the ugly truth.

And when Herman Cain brings up the truth about people like Margaret Sanger, where most abortion clinics just happen to be located (in black neighborhoods) and that it is black babies that are killed in droves inside them, well Planned Parenthood doesn’t know how to respond other than to attack the messenger.

“Seventy-five percent of those facilities were built in the black community. In Margaret Sanger’s own words, she didn’t use the word ‘genocide,’ but she did talk about preventing the increasing number of poor blacks in this country by preventing black babies from being born,” Cain told CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

Planned Parenthood’s response:

“It is simply unacceptable for those who oppose legal abortion to use inflammatory and divisive language based on race to push an ideological agenda,” Veronica Byrd, director of African American media for the Planned Parenthood Action Fund said in a statement responding to Cain’s remarks.

Gee, that rebuttal is just vague enough to work, eh? Why does this group of baby killers need a special “director or African American media” anyway? That sounds awfully “divisive” To me. After all, it implies that blacks need to be handled differently and given a different message on abortion that other people do. I wonder why that is? Perhaps Planned Parenthood has decided that the sheep being slaughtered need a little extra convincing?

Ah, liberals. They are always good for a laugh over their hypocrisy … and a few dead babies. But hey, killing babies is their business. It is what they do. And for them, business is good. For the babies that enter their facilities though? Not so much.

The Women’s Medical Society in West Philadelphia provides a stark reality check for those that blindly believe the lies abortion advocates put forth to hide their true intent, to kill babies no matter what. Yes, even if they are born alive.

Adrienne Moton plead guilty to third degree murder. Read carefully and ask yourself if anyone, anyone other than someone who had the pure, evil intention to simply kill babies would have done this:

The grand jury said that a clinic co-worker of Moton’s testified that a woman gave birth to a large baby at the clinic, delivering the child into a toilet. The jurors identified the newborn as “Baby D.”

The jurors said the co-worker told them that the baby was moving and looked like it was swimming.

“Moton reached into the toilet, got the baby out and cut its neck,” the grand jury said in its report.

Other employees are also accused of murder as well including Dr. Kermit Gosnell. He:

“killed babies and endangered women. What we mean is that he regularly and illegally delivered live, viable babies in the third trimester of pregnancy — and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors.”

Abortion mills are not about helping women. They are about killing babies, even those that survive initial attempts at abortion. And this sort of devilish action is the norm.

Don’t stand between a eugenicist and their prey.

Realizing this problem with their thought process they thus seek to dehumanize the unborn child as liberals have always sought to dehumanize those they wish to eliminate. Of course they cannot succeed in this endeavor except among their fellow travelers because from the moment of conception the unborn child meets every standard of human life. Looking human, a common refrain heard in justification of the unborn child not being alive, it not a requirement of such. Nor is the other common claim that it is a parasite a valid argument against the life of the unborn child. Parasites, like leaches, and indeed alive and any honest biologist will tell you that.

Just like one does not have the right to run down, on purpose, a jaywalker on the street because having to stop to avoid that person would impede temporarily their pursuit of happiness or inconvenience them, one does not have the right to murder a child in the womb for the same reason.

We are not talking about threats to the mother’s life here. Rather we are discussing a simple desire to not carry an innocent child whose life is supposed to be protected in all other circumstances under the laws of just civil society.

How do you civilly discuss the topic with uncivil people? Spare me your calls for cooler rhetoric in the face of such evil for I shall not back down to sooth your frail sensitivities.

Hey J.J. You Rock!

Why is it that you seem to be the only site talking about Melissa Haluszczak?

Any way do you know where Melissa stands on Abortion?

-Anne

Well Anne, she is not touting her stance on the issue under her “Issues” tab but she does say that she is against federal funding of abortion under her Family and Marriage tab. If you look at her endorsement page she has the endorsement of LifePAC which is a pro-life group. So you can pretty much draw the conclusion from this that she is anti-abortion to some extent. Whether she is anti all abortions, anti abortion except in the case of the life of the mother being in danger or anti abortion except in the case of life endangerment for the mother, rape or incest I cannot say.

Is it this bad? Really? Is it this bad that I have to be telling voters where Haluszczak stands on the issues? Talk about problems getting your message out.

You’re welcome again Melissa for the help.

Sixty-seven percent (67%) of voters nationwide now expect that health care reform legislation will pass this year. That’s up from 49% before the Senate passed its version of the legislation on Christmas Eve – and by far the highest level of expectation yet measured.

But while Americans are resigned to the passage of the latest leftist unconstitutional bill, they do not like it. Support has remained steadily in the minority for the plan with just 40% in favor of it and 55% opposed.

There has been a lot of talk lately about the public option,abortion funding and other more radical and unconstitutional things being dropped from the final bill in order to help its passage once it comes out of conference. Seriously? The House is sewn up with their version of the bill and it was only because the Senate needed 60 votes to pass their version that such things were severely restricted or removed in their version. Now that the bill has been passed through the smaller house thanks to lots of bribes and special, state specific treatments that violate the equal protect provisions of the Constitution the Senate only needs 51 votes once the final version comes up. Looks to me like we have about 6 or 7 people in the Democrat’s caucus that might defect over the House version.  That still gives the Senate plenty of votes to pass such a hideous bill. So why should the radical socialists of the House of Representatives be happy to roll over and play dead for the sake of the Senate?

If this all comes to pass you can thank all those whores in the Senate who sold their votes for cash and perks and voted on that chamber’s version and pushed it to 60 votes for passage for all of this. But maybe that is their plan all along? Some of these Democratic Senators in states where their citizenry are very unhappy with the plans for socialized medicine and face an uphill reelection campaign can help their party masters and help get the plan passed while in the end voting against it and telling the voters in their state so. If this is indeed their plan will Americans fall for it?

I hope not.

Ms. Boxer, a virulent proponent of murdering babies, when arguing for funding for abortions to be included in the Senate version of Obamacare actually claimed that denying public funds to murder children is the same as not letting men buy private insurance to cover the costs of their Viagra.

Yeahhhhh … riiiiiight.

Here is what she said:

“Why are women being singled out here? It’s so unfair,” Boxer said on the Senate floor Tuesday. “We don’t tell men that if they want to … buy insurance coverage through their pharmaceutical plan for Viagra that they can’t do it.”

Ok, I guess it is time to spoon feed this loon the answer.

First however federal payment for medical care is unconstitutional. The whole plan she is in favor of should not be implemented based on this simple fact. That is the FIRST thing.

Now, let’s look at the stupidity she has oozed. She is actually comparing a man choosing to spend extra money in the private sector with tax payer dollars being used specifically to murder children in the womb? Hey Ms. Boxer, maybe you ought to read the 14th Amendment. You know, the one about how no state shall take the LIFE of someone without due process of law and them having been found guilty of a crime?

Hey Ms. Boxer, NO ONE IS FREAKING MURDERED WHEN A MAN GETS INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR HIS HARD ON MEDICATION! Geeze! Are you REALLY that FREAKING stupid? I am not aware of any ethical and moral problems with getting wood, are you?

Let’s be honest here folks. If you have ever voted for this woman you are mentally deficient. Seek help immediately! And take her to the doctor with you.