What If Physical Traits Were Not Allowed To Be Considered?

A green skinned man with silver eyes who stands 7’4″ tall and weighs 275 lbs walks into a bank, pulls a gun and demands all the money in the vault.  He escapes and elude police who arrive as quickly as they can.  What would the APB put on on this criminal sound like?  Well, that depends on whether or not you are a liberal.

If you are not a liberal the following traits would be included:

green skin
male
silver eyes
7’4″ tall
275 lbs

You would, as a non-liberal, do this because it gives an accurate description of the perp and allow you to focus on a smaller set of suspects than if you were a liberal and started ignoring certain physical traits of the perp just so you did not offend anyone. In fact, as a non-liberal, you would probably find your perp very quickly by giving an accurate description as the one above because there are probably very few green skinned, 7’4″ tall males weighing 275 lbs with silver eyes out there. You also, as a non-liberal, would not want to be rounding up people needlessly and harassing obviously innocent citizens who did not have these traits just for the sake of political correctness because the NAAGP (the National Association for the Advancement of Green-skinned Peoples) might raise a stink. Yes, you might round up two or three such persons and obviously only one of them is guilty of the crime but it sure beats rounding up 100′s or even 1000′s of suspects because you want to ignore the obvious.

For liberals however noting that the suspect has green skin would be considered racial profiling. Considering that the suspect is male might then, I suppose also be considered gender profiling. Taking into account the suspects height and weight would also be considered some sort of profiling as well. Heck, even the bizarre color of this suspect’s eyes might fit under some ethnic or medical condition profiling as well.

Liberals talk about how racial profiling is wrong. But when you have an accurate description of a suspect shouldn’t all information about the suspect be given? The information is not bad. It is just information. Some people may abuse that information but that is not the fault of the information is it?

But for someone reason liberals have a phobia about admitting that in border states a lot of illegal immigrants are some flavor of Hispanic. We are, for some strange reason, not allowed to discuss that fact when dealing with the issue of illegal immigration and law enforcement officials are castigated if they even hint at the fact that when looking for illegals in certain regions they take a much more critical look at people who look to be from south of the border.

It is like the police ignoring that the suspect in my example above was a green skinned man.

In other areas of the country illegal immigrants are not as largely Hispanic as they are in some. In some regions illegal immigrants are majority Chinese while in others they are mostly Russian (that would be white skinned people just so we are clear) as just two examples. In those regions officials are just as right to use those traits to target and find illegal aliens as they are to consider that in some other places Hispanics are the majority of illegal aliens. The police do not, of course have the right to stop everyone that speaks a certain language or looks a certain way and question them and they do not do this. They must have other evidence to go on. But to ignore obvious physical traits for a suspect once that person has given an indication that they are a suspect would be asinine.

It sure would not be fair, if like mentioned above, we at the behest of liberals had to omit the fact that our perp was green and set about to round up a group of black, white and Asian men just to feel good about our selves would it? No, because that would waste valuable resources and ignore the obvious.