Hey, they just cannot help themselves. Anyone that knows history, not fabricated “facts” fed to them by liberals, knows that it was the Democratic Party that supported and fought to preserve racism in America. And guess what? They still DO! If you have racist beliefs the Democratic Party is the party where you will be most at home.
Unlike how the left has to make up controversies about Americans like Rush Limbaugh to try and make him look like a racist, when discussing the left all we have to do is look at how they actually act. Take for example Eric Holder’s/Barack Obama’s Justice Department which has now, for all intents and purposes, told whites that they are too stupid to vote for Democrats unless there is a little “D” next to their name. And what is worse? They have told blacks that they are too stupid to get elected without such a clear marker being displayed!
Oh no, this is absolutely no joke!
Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.
The Justice Department’s ruling, which affects races for City Council and mayor, went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” – identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.The department ruled that white voters in Kinston will vote for blacks only if they are Democrats and that therefore the city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want.
I remind you of the actual definition of racism which is a belief that someone, because of their race, is either inherently inferior or incapable or superior. You know, not equal to everyone else. If this is not claiming that the white voters are too incompetent to know who to vote for without a “D” on the ballot I do not know what is. The problem here is that Kinston, the city where all this is going on, is a firmly Democratic town. Perhaps liberals are afraid that without party affiliations on the ballots that voters would actually, GASP, learn the positions of the candidates themselves and vote in that manner instead of looking for a letter next to the name as some sort of a sign as to whether or not the candidate is “acceptable?”
Yeah, yeah, I hear all you liberals belly aching saying that this decision has nothing to do with race. Well apparently Loretta King disagrees!
“Removing the partisan cue in municipal elections will, in all likelihood, eliminate the single factor that allows black candidates to be elected to office,” Loretta King, who at the time was the acting head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division, wrote in a letter to the city.
This makes about as much sense as Bill Clinton proclaiming that oral sex was not really sex. The “single factor” that allows blacks to be elected is the letter next to their name on election day? Not their qualifications? Not their abilities? Without the Democratic Party they cannot get elected? Sort of like the old excuse that blacks could not get by without the care of their white slave holders during colonial times eh?
In a town where no one can remember the last Republican elected how is it so hard for blacks to be elected as Ms. King proclaims? Is there some magical allure that causes people to only vote for blacks in this town if there is a “D” next to their name? If there is no “D” there will they not be elected? And how is this if the city is a Democratic Party stronghold?
How is it so hard for black candidates to be elected when 63% of the population is black!
And here is a really good question for the idiots at the Justice Department. How come only blacks get to elect their “candidate of choice?” What about all the other people regardless of their race? Are they not important? And what if the “candidate of choice” for the blacks happens to be some race other than black? Is that allowed? Hard to believe it would be since the entire argument here has been that blacks cannot get elected in a majority black town and that their candidates of choice are to be black, hence why this ruling was made in the first place!
It’s all very confusing. And racists have been found in all the nooks and crannies here. But thank GOD we have such smart people in the Justice Department to tell us that blacks are too stupid to vote for blacks unless told what party the black candidate belongs to, whites are also too stupid to vote for blacks without being told the same, that the candidates of choice for blacks must be black and that even though they make up the majority of the town they cannot get elected without government getting involved. Whatever would we do without the nanny state to guide us?
What’s next? Little notes on the ballot that say, “This candidate is black and has been determined to be the ‘candidate of choice’ for blacks. No need to know what his or her stance on the issues are. Just pull the lever for him/her like a good little sheep and close your eyes because it will all be over soon and you are not smart enough to determine who to vote for. This message has been paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Re-elect Obama 2012 Campaign.”
Yeah, I know, you liberals really hate me and this site … but that’s what happens when the truth hits a little too close to home so get over it.
Some of you may be wondering which race, after insulting both blacks and whites, that liberals think are superior in all of this. Haven’t you figured it out yet? Why the Liberals are the superior race. The rest of us are just neanderthals in their eyes.
RSS Feed
Loading ...