Planned Parenthood’s Pants Are Down
A LIBERTY REBORN EXLUSIVE
To this day I firmly believe that there are those who think they live in a Stalinist paradise where they can control information. I do not come to that conclusion without having actually witnessed actions that support this claim mind you. And every now and again I get further supporting evidence to bolster this assertion.
Take for example the recent case of a Planned Parenthood abortion mill in California whose employees gleefully instructed a 15-year old who was pregnant by a 23-year old how to lie in order to obtain an abortion without having to report the case as statutory rape to the authorities. Eager to add another notch in their belt, Planned Parenthood began their typical routine to convince her to have an abortion. After all, that’s their job. They entered into their talking points and reminded her that surely she would be the subject of embarrassment if she didn’t divulge herself of that “lump of cells” inside of her.
Boy did Planned Parenthood ever step in it though because Lila Rose was not a 15-year old who by California law had been victim of statutory rape and which Planned Parenthood was under the legal obligation to report. Nope. Rather she was a student at UCLA doing and expose and was equipped with equipment to capture the whole incident on tape. And the information gathered was quickly disseminated through outlets like YouTube.
Enter the lawyers and the ever ready weapon of people that cannot defend their ideology; the lawsuit. Planned Parenthood demanded that the original recordings showing their attempts to circumvent the law be surrendered. But at issue here is the truth. And that truth is that Planned Parenthood has only one function – get women to have abortions and do so in any way they can. And I do mean any way; even if it means circumventing the law and then gathering up the evidence of the act after the fact.
Ultimately all they are doing is trying to distract attention away from the fact that their employees were engaged in unlawful behavior and were engaged in such behavior willingly. Would we expect anything less from Mary Jane Wagle and her minions at Planned Parenthood?
So I thought that now would be a good time to debunk the talking points that that unborn child from the point of conception is nothing more than a “lump of cells” and not human life. After all, when that “lump of cells” becomes recognized as what it is, human life, it is granted certain protections. One of those protections is of course the right to life which cannot be taken away without due process.
What is and what is not life is still a little iffy in the sense that some proposed definitions would make even stars living organisms. But what we really want to see is whether or not that “lump of cells” is a human life or not.
So in order to do that, we’ll look at six basic “standards” for what is generally considered life.
First, in order to be called life, what we are looking at must be “organized”. Does a fertilized egg have one or more cells or similar structure? Yes it does. It is organized.
Second, in order to be called life, what we are looking at must exhibit “metabolism”. Does what Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortionists call a “lump of cells” consume energy and transform it into cellular components? Yes it does. It has a metabolism.
Third, in order to be called life, what we are looking at must exhibit a process of regulation and maintain a constant state (called homeostasis). Does even just a fertilized egg do this? Yes it certainly does.
Fourth, in order to be called life, what we are looking at must “grow”. Ok, so does that “lump of cells” maintain a state of growth (ie a higher rate of synthesis than catalyst)? Yes it does.
Fifth, in order to be called life, what we are looking at must respond to stimuli. Ok, now does that “lump of cells” respond to stimuli such as seek out a source of nutrition by implanting in the uterine wall, etc? Yes it does.
And lastly, in order to be called life, what we are looking at must possess the potential ability for reproduction. Ok, so does that lump of cells reproduce or have the potential to reproduce? Yes it does.
In fact I would be willing to take any possible addition to this list as a test that applies to living organisms and state unequivocally that that “lump of cells” also meets those standards as well.
But every now and again you get some Smart Alec pro-abortionist that tries really hard to be smart and will say something like “Yeah, well that lump of cells can’t survive outside of the mother so it’s not alive.” To which I can always be sure to make their head spin by reminding them that there are lots of “living” things that require a host in order to survive from leeches to bacteria that can’t live outside of the digestive tract of certain animals. They are still alive. Just ask any biologist without an agenda if you doubt this.
Ok, so then the pro-abortionist will usually shoot back with something like, “Well it’s not intelligent!” So? Lot’s of living things are not “intelligent”. I mean you can try and make the argument that amoebas are not living organisms if you like and be laughed at. Go ahead.
That’s usually when the “NAZI” references start. It’s ok though I can take it.
So, once all the wanna-be smart people throw out there attempts at claiming that I missed some definition that would prove that “lump of cells” isn’t alive I can pose the last question. That question is that does that life, which we have just shown to exist, have the one trait that ultimately makes it human. Does it have Homosapen DNA?
What’s that? It does?
My God that makes it human life after all. Too bad for Planned Parenthood and the pro-abortionists because. Because that makes their actions murder; unless the can prove self defense. So we can just add that on top of the charge of aiding and abetting a rapist. They have been caught with their pants down. All the threats and posturing cannot hide the truth.
* This article is a Liberty Reborn EXCLUSIVE and may not be reprinted without the purchase of a license for this particular article. If you wish to request a license and pricing information for reprinting this article you must contact J.J. Jackson at jackson@thelandofthefree.net
Loading ...